Criteria | Guiding questions | Check - | Check | Check + |
Quality of needfinding presentations (40%) | Is your presentation clear, insightful, and to the point? Does it concisely cover the problem setting, Web community analysis, stakeholder needs, personas, and interview analysis? | The presentation fulfills the requirements, but the needs analysis is superficial and difficult to understand. | The presentation does a nice job of framing the problem space and provides non-obvious insights about user needs. Key design questions are raised. | Great talk. The needs analysis clearly and concisely presents the problem space and offers thoughtful and generative insights about different stakeholder perspectives. Presents key design questions that will clearly guide ideation. |
Breadth of social media data analysis (20%) | Did you strive for gathering a broad and diverse of opinions from various online resources? Did you rigorously analyze the data? Can you articulate common trends and notable outliers? | Students did the minimal amount of effort to fulfill the assignment. The data analysis does not demostrate rigor. | Students gathered a useful dataset and conducted a rigorous and systematic analysis. | Students created a large dataset from multiple sites, and gleaned important insights that would not have been discovered without an exhastive analysis. |
Insights through interviews (20%) | Did you interview people that have very different perspectives? Did anything surprise you or confirm something you thought was true? Can show why your findings are interesting? | Findings seem obvious and do not bring much new to the table. | Stduents provide a good variety of interesting insights collected from representative stakeholders. | Students offer very detailed and insightful observations documented from interviews with diverse, representative people. Insights are compelling or surprising, making good material for ideation. |
Clarity of stakeholder personas (20%) | Are your personas representative of the people who have stake in a new design invention? Are your personas descriptions detailed and believable? | Personas feel stereotypical, repetitive, or do not cover key perspectives. | The personas represent key points of view in the problem space. They are also clear and feasible. | The personas represent important stakeholders and creatively demonstrate these points of view. They help frame the problem space and provide clues for who to interview. |